🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate gatherings where Black people are paid to address Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The wave has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since those days, focusing less on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the celebration is observed is a reflection of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how co-option leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the recent season we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are surging in Europe as a complete entity.

In the US, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A campaign to remove Black history and narrative from the archives is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance symbolises how minimally it can be effective if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the realities of the current era. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not avoid politics, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has simple recognition of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the threats that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.