Relatives' Anguish Over Shoreline Erosion Endangering Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.
A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards
Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.
A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy
Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.
“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Searching for Solutions and Clarity
The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.
“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”
He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”
The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.